Your Favorite Math/Logic Riddles? // + Cannaboids 4younger CNS //
Your Favorite Math/Logic Riddles?
and ==>http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=05/10/16/0229239
Here's the puzzle:
A group of people live on an island. They are all perfect logicians -- if a conclusion can be logically deduced, they will do it instantly. No one knows the color of their eyes. Every night at midnight, a ferry stops at the island. If anyone has figured out the color of their own eyes, they [must] leave the island that midnight.
On this island live 100 blue-eyed people, 100 brown-eyed people, and the Guru. The Guru has green eyes, and does not know her own eye color either. Everyone on the island knows the rules and is constantly aware of everyone else's eye color, and keeps a constant count of the total number of each (excluding themselves). However, they cannot otherwise communicate. So any given blue-eyed person can see 100 people with brown eyes and 99 people with blue eyes, but that does not tell them their own eye color; it could be 101 brown and 99 blue. Or 100 brown, 99 blue, and the one could have red eyes.
The Guru speaks only once (let's say at noon), on one day in all their endless years on the island. Standing before the islanders, she says the following:
"I can see someone with blue eyes."
Who leaves the island, and on what night?
There are no mirrors or reflecting surfaces, nothing dumb, It is not a trick question, and the answer is logical. It doesn't depend on tricky wording, and it doesn't involve people doing something silly like creating a sign language or doing genetics. The Guru is not making eye contact with anyone in particular; she's simply saying "I count at least one blue-eyed person on this island who isn't me."
And lastly, the answer is not "no one leaves."
--
What the hell am I doing with a webcomic [xkcd.com]? When did /that/ happen?
============
It is still in doubt actually
(Score:5, Insightful)
by nietsch (112711) Alter Relationship on Sunday October 16, @04:21AM (#13802147)
(http://linux-studie.nl/ | Last Journal: Wednesday April 21, @01:22PM)
The mentioned research used 'canaboids', which is a group of componds resembling those found in cannabis(THC). It was already known that the brain uses neurotransmitters that are in the form of canaboids and it contains several types of receptor for it, just like opiates have human equivalents in the form of endorfines.
But similar results done with THC (Tetra Hydro Cannabinol), the main compound in hash and weed have found no evidence for this cellgrowth stimulation. So let's not jump for joy yet. One experiment/paper does not mean it has been accepted as scientific fact yet.
Besides, you can be sure that with such a hot subject and the way research is financed/politiced there will be more research 'debunking' this even if it turns out to be true after all.
--
please click some ads here [linux-studie.nl]
=============
Yay!
(Score:5, Funny)
by sveskemus (833838) Alter Relationship on Sunday October 16, @03:41AM (#13802028)
(http://www.mikkelwinther.dk/)
I always suspected... uhm, what were we talking about again?
--
Noise Is Music Podcast [mikkelwinther.dk].
=============
HU-210
(Score:5, Funny)
by gfody (514448) Alter Relationship on Sunday October 16, @03:57AM (#13802073)
The team injected laboratory rats with a synthetic substance called HU-210, which is similar, but 100 times as potent as THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol), the compound responsible for giving marijuana users a high.
Clearly my dealer has been lying to me. He swore there was nothing stronger than his stuff. Where do I get HU-210? ..or better yet, how do I make it?
--
bite my glorious golden ass.
==============
Why are rats attending a hippocampus in the first place?
==============
Research on Cannabinoids in Cannabis
(Score:5, Informative)
by Ron Bennett (14590) Alter Relationship on Sunday October 16, @05:30AM (#13802317)
(http://www.wyomissing.com/bennett/)
What a surprise to click on Slashdot and see news about cannabinoids - I feel like I'm reading my own site ...
I operate CANNABIS.COM ... shortcut url http://cann.com/ [cann.com]
Some informative pages to check out:
Lots of cannabis Research information *with sources listed*
http://www.cannabis.com/research/ [cannabis.com]
TR-446 Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of 1-Trans-Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (CAS No. 1972-08-3) in F344 Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Gavage Studies)
http://www.cannabis.com/research/tr446study.shtml [cannabis.com]
(mirror of the study published by the U.S. National Toxicity Program)
Cannabis News
http://www.cannabisnews.com/ [cannabisnews.com]
And finally, Erowid's Cannabis Vault...
http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/cannabis.sht ml [erowid.org]
Ron Bennett
===============
George Bush should think upon this....
(Score:5, Funny)
by Khyber (864651) Alter Relationship
(Last Journal: Saturday October 15, @02:55PM)
This one phrase out to put his mind into action.
Man brewed alcohol, God created marijuana. Who're you going to trust, Mr. Resident?
=============
It is still in doubt actually
(Score:5, Insightful)
by nietsch (112711) Alter Relationship on Sunday October 16, @04:21AM (#13802147)
(http://linux-studie.nl/ | Last Journal: Wednesday April 21, @01:22PM)
The mentioned research used 'canaboids', which is a group of componds resembling those found in cannabis(THC). It was already known that the brain uses neurotransmitters that are in the form of canaboids and it contains several types of receptor for it, just like opiates have human equivalents in the form of endorfines.
But similar results done with THC (Tetra Hydro Cannabinol), the main compound in hash and weed have found no evidence for this cellgrowth stimulation. So let's not jump for joy yet. One experiment/paper does not mean it has been accepted as scientific fact yet.
Besides, you can be sure that with such a hot subject and the way research is financed/politiced there will be more research 'debunking' this even if it turns out to be true after all.
--
please click some ads here [linux-studie.nl]
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home